Showing posts with label Sean O'Hagan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sean O'Hagan. Show all posts

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

The Americans by Robert Frank

"It is difficult to remember how shocking Robert Frank's book was," the late, great John Szarkowski wrote in 1968, having curated an earlier show of the work at New York's Museum of Modern Art. "The pictures took us by ambush then ... He established a new iconography for contemporary America, comprised of bits of bus depots, lunch counters, strip developments, empty spaces, cars, and unknowable faces."
Sean O'Hagan, The Guardian, 30th November 2009

I have been looking at Robert Frank's The Americans as I recently bought the book.  It is is such a famous collection and so much of an influence on most photographers that I thought it was about time I got round to doing so.

Briefly, Robert Frank, was a Swiss national born in 1924 who emigrated to America in 1947. He worked at Harper's Bazaar before travelling in South America and Europe, and then returned to America where he became established as one of a group of successful photographers including Diane Airbus. He was heavily influenced and guided by Walker Evans, and in 1955 with his help, secured a Guggenheim Fellowship allowing him to travel across the States. 

"Frank, then in his early 30s, shot 500 rolls of film on three separate road trips across America, with his first wife and two young children in tow. It was a dogged and exhausting undertaking, even with the assistance of the Guggenheim fellowship that helped fund it." (1)

Although he shot 500 rolls only 84 images made it into the final book and according to Sean O'Hagan when you look at his contact sheets you will be amazed by his precision.  He took very few shots at each scene and although the final edited image may not have been the most conventionally framed it is often as close to perfect in terms of being a decisive moment. 

Controversy surrounded the book's publication.  Frank's view was not the optimistic vision that people were used to seeing although on the surface it was the style that was criticised, as a quote I found on the Wiki site suggests:  'Popular Photography, for one, derided his images as "meaningless blur, grain, muddy exposures, drunken horizons and general sloppiness"'.  Bet they felt clever shortly afterwards - although sales started slowly it quickly became popular and is now one of the most influential photography books of the 20th century.

When I looked at the book I was intrigued by all the style and subject choices which I see in so many photographers' work today.  But what's even more fascinating really is how very powerful his work is in transporting you to the time and place.  Although I was not in 50's America something happened to my senses and I was transported there; moments from my own childhood in South Africa, in the hot, dusty outbacks of Jo'burg flooded back into my mind and I could almost hear the buzz of the surrounding landscape and smell something of it too. I suspect there will have been some similarities between SA backwater 'dorps' and the small American towns Frank visited.

Butte, Montana  - an image of a woman in a car with children in the back all looking out the window is just great.  I love the expression on the woman's face - you get such a strong sense of what she is feeling and I'm desperate to know who they are all looking at like that.  The famous bus image which is on the cover of the book, named Trolley - New Orleans is fascinating, not only because of the faces and the racial segregation; a site, I imagine, that is far more shocking to modern eyes than it was to the people who first saw these images. (My first-hand experience of racial segregation perhaps makes it even more acute for me than it might otherwise be.)  But also because, for me anyway, of the extraordinary reflections and shapes and patterns on the bus especially above the windows.  It's like there is another world just out of touch, of ghosts and ghouls hovering above the unsuspecting passengers.  View from hotel window - Butte, Montana is wonderful to look at.  I can really sense the inside of the hotel room from the style of the curtains and the way the window has been photographed looking out over the industrial looking town.  I love the way Yom Kipper, East River, is composed.  It is so unconventional with nearly all the the people facing the opposite way, with very little of the faces we do see visible.  So much personality is recognisable in the hats and postures, and the hope and excitement in the little boy's profile is very clear.  I like the movement and atmosphere in Assembly line, Detroit - this will have been one of the images that the magazine Popular Photography found so difficult to take, I imagine.  Image after image throughout the book is so powerful, interesting and revealing about American culture.  It's a visual anthropological essay - although I know there are issues over how objective or subjective anthropologists are when in the field - and Frank has without any doubt recorded his own view of America but that of course is what makes it so resonant and artistic.  He sees the sadness, the mournful, the fake and the trouble that is very much at odds with the self perception of America at the time.  As an outsider he notices things people inside might not and takes the time to photograph and publish what he sees.  And so much of it so quotidian and mundane but his rendering of it is extraordinary and fascinating.

I'm glad I finally have the book and will of course be looking at many, many times again.









Guardian article by Sean O'Hagan

Wednesday, 14 January 2015

Lee Freidlander, (self portraits and predatory street photography)

I have been thinking about Lee Freidlander recently and read a little review of a book of his which came out a couple of years ago compiling all his self portraits.  I guess I am interested in this because my A4 is once again turned inwards rather than outwards (I actually do hope that by the time I get to A5 I find a way to look externally!).

I was really struck by the following sentence in Sean O'Hagan's review in The Guardian:

"One of his most famous photographs is of his own shadow falling on the back of a blonde woman in a fur coat, an image that says much about the often predatory nature of street photography.  It is, I guess,  a self portrait of a kind, albeit a metaphorical one."

I also read in Gerry Badger's The Genius of Photography "the wanderer with an unseen camera, a stalker and a hunter after images, not of exalted images but everyday life in the modern metropolis" referring to early street photographers.

Both these sentences suggest that street photography is somehow an aggressive act.  I know in Susan Sontag in On Photography discusses how it is better to be using a camera rather than a gun which is what people (men) would have done in the past.  That somehow street photography is fulfilling an innate human need to hunt, to stalk, to capture but that it does it less destructively but the predatory nature of street photography is nevertheless troubling.  Lying in wait to take an image of someone unbeknown to them or in defiance of their wishes, or at best with some level of complicity but not requested, simply taken.  It's difficult.

Yesterday I took a photograph in the doctor's waiting room because the light was doing what I like at the moment, creating very deep shadows which contrast greatly with bright sunshine and the woman in the frame got quite upset with me -  I explained that she couldn't even be seen, that I was actually taking a photo of the light and not of her - but I don't blame her for being cross.  There is something unpleasant about candid photography that has been totally uninvited whatsoever by the subjects being photographed.

Lee Freidlander was a prolific, street photographer who recorded "the American social landscape" which, despite my reservations about street photography expressed above, seems an important and worthwhile things for him to have spent his life doing.  His work is filled with reflections, odd angles and images of himself taking the photograph within the photograph.  His style and content are informed by ideas and concepts making the work not only a rich document of US culture but also an astute lifetime of comments and questions.

Friedlander's work, as with the shadow on the fur coat or with his face in the wing mirror, includes his self portrait fairly frequently, hence the book released a few years back which is all about his self portraiture.  In the book Why Does It NOT Have To Be In Focus, Jackie Higgins' discusses Friedlander's self portrait where he places a light bulb between his face and the camera 'debunking the age-old myth of the artist as a hero'.  There is an awareness in Friedlander's images which makes them highly intelligent.  His style 'defies traditional composition' making them 'metaphors for chaos that is modern life' as described by Lewis Baltz, a photographer quoted in the aforementioned book.

When I look at Friedlander's later self portraits there is a boldness and total absence of apology to them which I don't expect to see in similar women's work although off the top of my head Tracy Emin and Freida Kahlo break with with expectation.  This is interesting for me - I have been busy snapping myself again for A4 and feel a certain level of discomfort, although clearly not enough to change tac for now.  Since that is where I am heading I ought to dispense with the girly self depreciation and just get on with it!  At least I am involved, entirely aware and give permission - no one is stalking me, I'm not stalking anyone else and the whole predatory nature of candid photography is bypassed altogether.

I find Friedlander's work very interesting and am eager to look at it a but more.


Wikipedia
On Photography, Susan Sontag, Penguin Published 1977, Reissued 2008
Why Does it NOT Have To Be In Focus, Modern Photography Explained, Jackie Higgins, Thames & Hudson, September 2103
The Genius of Photography, Gerry Badger, Quadrille, Edition published 2014, Text copyright 2007